Ying-Ying is just a name of a panda

itsalwayssunnyinasgard:

I doodled a thing. [x]

(via wilwheaton)

karatam:

moraniarty:

rayrayslife:

thenimbus:

stringmouse:

I feel like I’m getting mixed signals from you, physics.

Absolutely Incredible

#WHAT IS HAPPENING

The little machine is vibrating the molecules of the water at a certain frequency and the stream lets us see the wave of that frequency.

I fucking love physics

Also with the first gif: The water hovering/freezing in mid air is a curious optical illusion that occurs when the frequency of the water matches that of the camera filming the water, most commonly with a 24fps camera and a 24hz sine wave, making it appear as if the water is static in the air. Check it out here and Here

My field is pretty cool.

alexlauren:

auxasia:

mentailments:

vodkacupcakes:

Each ball weighs differently, causing each one to bounce to a specific height, and when precisely placed in the dust pans and thrown down… 2013

Science, man

(Source: cineraria, via italkincursive)

paln-k:

sosuperawesome:

NASA on Tumblr, http://n-a-s-a.tumblr.com/

There was a time when I used to visit APOD (Astronomy picture of the day) every day… now I can have some on my dash!!!! yay

siterlas:

yoannmichaux:

Facts, Science World Ads (Museum of Science, Vancouver)

PROJECT MAYHEM, IS THAT YOU?

(via dealanexmachina)

(via playingfordean)

jodyrobots:

splendid

(Source: commie-pinko-liberal, via jelee-)

ohthisthinguswnt:

Our minds were blown. Our brains were boggled. We thought: How?

ESPN’s Sport Science gave us our answer:

“The ball left Pinoe’s left foot at a 30 degree angle and traveled more than 40 yards at over 30 miles per hour and missed the keepers hand by 2 inches.

If her foot had made…

nachotypicalbromance:

colonelstarstorm:

gingerhaole:

shuraiya:

Actually, that can be explained with ~SCIENCE~

The sketchiness of line art mimics the natural lack of clarity in our peripheral vision. When we look at the real world, our high definition fovea can only focus on a small area at a time. By having a very clean line art, it creates the unnatural feel of high clarity over a large area that’s not possible when we look at real life, therefore line art tends to appear stiff and not as appealing as the sketch. This sketichiness technique was first utilized by impressionists to create an optical illusion of motion (along with other techniques like equiluminance).

Source: Vision and Art: The Biology of Seeing by Margaret Livingston

Reblogging for an interesting bit of SCIENCE.

Fuck me, I KNEW there was a reason! FUCK YOU, SCIENCE, YOU ASSHOLE

EVERYTHING CAN BE EXPLAINED WITH SCIENCE

SCIENCE! WHAT CAN’T IT DO!

(via lapiforsarchive)